Donald Rumsfeld couldn't have had better timing. On the day before
the most calamitous attack in United States history, the U.S Secretary
of Defense told CNN how fortunate the world had been that, in 1981,
Israel had bombed and destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak.
He was talking ostensibly about preventative attacks that might spare
the world the devastation of a rogue nuclear assault.
But he was also plainly referring to Israeli measures to counteract
terrorism and the justification for pre-emptive strikes.
In the light of what occurred on September 11, it could be stated
with certainty that there are few Americans who would now disagree
with him. Pre-emptive action would have saved the lives of thousands
of Americans and could unquestionably save even more now. With this
in mind, the regular condemnation of Israel by the State Department
and the incessant media outcry against Israel's surgical elimination
of terror cells, now seem like ghostly murmurs from a distant past.
They in fact belong to a different world - a world more engaged in
moral relativism and one far less willing to draw the stark distinctions
between good and evil that Israelis have been required to make for
years.
But while the world has changed in ways still unknown, a regressive
blind spot remains lodged in the world's
consciousness. The French ambassador to Israel, Jacques Huntzinger,
told Israeli reporters on Thursday that there could be no comparisons
drawn between the acts of terror perpetrated in the United States
and Palestinian terrorism in Israel. Such a view reveals how unwilling
are many of the world's statesmen to make the association between
acts of Islamic terror in Israel and those occurring elsewhere. But
as mounting evidence links Yasser Arafat's terror campaign against
Israel with other Islamic terrorist campaigns in Sudan, Lebanon and
Afghanistan, that unwillingness will suffer decisive challenge. It
will underscore the cold reality that the only difference between
an Islamic fundamentalist who blows himself up in a Jerusalem restaurant
and another who deliberately rams the World Trade Center, is that
one of them knows how to fly a plane.
Similarly, anyone looking for the ideological underpinnings of the
attack on the United States or anti-Americanism articulated with true
socio-pathic bile, need look no further than the Palestinian Authority.
Reports that an Associated Press cameraman was threatened with his
life, as he dared to record the sight of 3,000 Palestinians celebrating
the American tragedy in the streets of Balata refugee camp, are now
ubiquitous. But who needs videotape? These recent quotes, fresh off
the press from official Palestinian organs, should suffice:
"[The Palestinians must]... harm American interests in the Arab
world, with all possible means, in all places, at all levels, because
the United States does not understand the language of logic and wisdom,
but only the language of interests and force." [Omar Helm Ghul,
Al-Ayyam, Aug. 30, 2001]
"The suicide bombers of today are the noble successors of their
noble predecessors... the Lebanese suicide bombers, who taught the
US Marines a tough lesson in [Lebanon]... These suicide bombers are
the salt of the earth, the engines of history... They are the most
honorable [people] among us..."
[Al Hayat Al Jadida - Official Palestinian Authority daily, Sept.
11, 2001]
While it may well have been disarming to see a shaken Yasser Arafat
muttering his condolences after the terrorist attacks, no one should
forget that this is the man who wrote the manual on international
terrorism and built a thirty year career on killing innocent civilians.
For several years there had been hopes that Arafat would reform. In
vain. The terrorist strain within him may well be implacable. Indeed,
the past 12 month resort to violence and suicide bombs have revealed
him to be no more a statesman than a ruthless overlord of a drug cartel.
But Arafat's recidivism and anti-Americanism needs only drive one
imperative home for the United States: that his recognized links with
Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the Sudanese and the Iranians converts
Palestinian terror from a home product into one manufactured for export.
There can be no greater warning for American security interests.
Many Israeli supporters recall bitterly how George Bush Sr. formed
the Gulf War coalition by bowing to Arab pressure and excluding Israel.
In that war the Israelis were asked to absorb multiple missile attacks
and millions of dollars worth of damage without the ability to respond
in any practical way. How reckless it would now be for that president's
son, as he pieces together a new coalition, to fail to recognize Palestinian
terror as also a war against the United States. How imprudent to disavow,
not only Israel's seasoned capabilities as a combatant in that struggle,
but its unenviable role riding shotgun in the world's risk-laden journey
from Osirak to the ruins of the World Trade Center in New York City.